Baby Food Lawsuits for South Dakota Residents
National Law Firm for Heavy Metal Baby Food Lawsuits in South Dakota
If your child or a child in your family has suffered from side effects of exposure to toxic heavy metals from baby food in South Dakota, you may have grounds to file a baby food lawsuit against the manufacturers. Baby food lawsuits for heavy metals allow South Dakota parents and families harmed by baby food toxins to seek compensation for the permanent damages and suffering that have resulted from these harmful products.
A congressional report released in February of 2021 exposed the heavy metal content of many major baby foods sold commercially in South Dakota and throughout the United States. Specifically, the report outlined the levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury found in four major baby food brands sold in South Dakota, Beech-Nut, HappyBABY, Earth's Best Organic and Gerber. Finished products and raw ingredients from each of the companies contain staggering levels of toxic heavy metals. Heavy metals in South Dakota baby foods can cause severe and irreversible harm to the neurological and brain development of babies and young children in South Dakota, resulting in lifelong challenges and disabilities.
Critics point to the fact that baby food manufacturers have long since been aware of the dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals in baby foods, yet have failed to take action to protect our nation's most vulnerable citizens. Baby foods containing heavy metals bear no warning or label to indicate the risk of exposure and South Dakota families have used these products with now knowledge of the danger. Federal regulators are no better; information on toxic baby food was brought before the FDA under President Trump in 2019 and the agency took no action to increase consumer safety. Manufacturers have continued to profit grossly in this $6 billion-plus industry, while jeopardizing the futures of millions of American children, including countless children in South Dakota.
The congressional report recommends a system of mandatory testing and labeling to remove heavy metals from baby foods. Unfortunately, the threat of major litigation may be the only effective way to force baby food manufacturers to become better corporate citizens. Children in South Dakota and across America have suffered from the side effects of heavy metals in baby foods, which include lower IQ and academic performance, ADHD, autism, and other neurological problems.
Baby Food Lawsuits for Toxic Contaminants for South Dakota Residents
If your child or a baby in your family developed side effects of heavy metal exposure from baby food sold commercially in South Dakota, you may qualify to file a baby food lawsuit to recover compensation for damages you have suffered as a result of these dangerous products. Filing a lawsuit is the only way to secure compensation for the irreversible damage, suffering and loss that have resulted from toxic baby food in South Dakota. Our attorneys accept heavy metal baby food lawsuits from South Dakota and around the United States, and offer no-cost, no-obligation baby food lawsuit case review for persons in South Dakota who match this description. To discuss your situation in detail with an attorney and to learn about baby food lawsuit time limits in South Dakota, please complete our online contact form. One of our attorneys handling heavy metal baby food lawsuits for South Dakota residents will contact you promptly.
Who can file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit?
Families whose child suffered from developmental or neurological problems as a result of consuming heavy metals in baby foods may be eligible to file a claim against the manufacturers. Click here to learn more.
South Dakota Baby Food Lawsuits Are Not Class Action Lawsuits
Many persons whose child suffered the aftereffects of exposure to heavy metals from baby foods in South Dakota wonder if filing a baby food lawsuit will result in meaningful compensation for their family. Baby food lawsuits from South Dakota families will not be class action lawsuits in which those who file a claim can expect only a small, symbolic settlement. On the contrary, lawyers handling baby food lawsuits believe South Dakota parents and family members of children who have developed autism, ADHD, or other side effects from baby food heavy metal exposure in South Dakota may be entitled to significant compensation. Baby food lawsuits from South Dakota are likely to be consolidated with others from around the nation as Multi-District Litigation (MDL), in which each claim will be handled on its own merit and compensation will be determined based on the degree of suffering of each plaintiff.
South Dakota Baby Food Lawsuits: No Fees Unless We Collect for You
We will represent all persons involved in a baby food heavy metal lawsuit from South Dakota on a contingency basis, meaning our lawyers never charge legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of our baby food attorneys serving South Dakota for heavy metal exposure claims will contact you to answer any of your questions.
No-Cost, No-Obligation Baby Food Lawsuit Case Review for South Dakota Families If Your Child Suffered Side Effects from Toxic Baby Food
OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $1.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won $197 million in three talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis in 2016 and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.