Each State Must Address The Toxic Baby Food Brands On Their WIC-Approved List And Remove The Offenders
Companies that produce baby foods that test for high amounts of toxic heavy metals should not be subsidized through government food programs
Friday, January 7, 2022 - One of the more insidious angles playing out in the continuing investigation of heavy metals in baby food is the abuse of Federal government-sponsored food programs, administered at the state level, to unload the toxic baby food on unsuspecting low-income minority populations. Reports continue to surface that indicate food programs intended to help feed low-income inner-city minorities force mothers with young children to purchase baby food that is tainted by heavy metal. Investigations have issued toxic baby food warnings. "Alarming levels of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury in baby food, exposed this year after a pair of Congressional reports pulled back the curtain on the industry's top brands for "knowingly keeping toxic products on the market" and "consistently cutting corners and putting profit over the health of babies and children." Mothers of children in low-income families are being steered to purchase contaminated food through, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program.
Each state is required to make a list of the foods that are available in the Federal food voucher program. WIC's mission is to provide healthy, nutritious food to families with children five and under that might not be able to afford them otherwise. Spotlight on America (SOA) went through each state's list of approved foods and found that some states only permitted buying brands of foods that Congress has determined contained toxic heavy metals. SOA found, for example, that those in Ohio were only permitted to purchase Gerber products that Congress had determined contained unacceptably high amounts of heavy metals. SOA told readers that Alaska, Hawaii, and Oregon had taken notice and removed rice cereals from their approved list because they were found to contain arsenic. Other states have failed to remove cereals from their food list and provide no warning to parents about the Congressional findings according to SOA. Although three states removed the toxic Gerber rice cereal, "That exact product remains on the WIC list in California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Texas, and Washington - potentially impacting millions of families." It may take an FDA recall of baby foods contaminated with heavy metals for the state governments to step up and amend their approved nutritious foods list. The National WIC Association addressed the toxic baby food findings from Congress last March and explained that it was up to the FDA to take action. "Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not set limits on heavy metals for baby foods except for arsenic in rice cereal. At the same time, baby food manufacturers are not required to test and disclose the amount of arsenic and other metals in their products." It is clear that nothing will be done until other concerned organization pressure the FDA to take action to remove Gerber, Beachnut, and other baby foods from the market.
More Recent NEC Formula Lawsuit News:
- Enfamil And Similac Lawsuits May Wind Up In Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) | 2/1/2022
- Support Growing In The Medical Community To Ban Cow's Milk Infant Formula | 1/24/2022
- Premature Babies Need Breastmilk To Avoid NEC And Fight Infection | 1/20/2022
- Lawsuits Detail Gruesome Surgeries That Premie's Face After Being Fed Enfamil and Similac Infant Formula | 1/18/2022
- Mothers Of Premie Babies Should Pump And Store Breast Milk, Avoiding The Need For Artificial Infant Formula | 1/13/2022
- Another Premie Infant Dies From Baby Formula Flesh-Eating Disease (NEC) | 1/7/2022
- Similac Falsely Claims To Be Structurally Identical To A Mother's Breast Milk | 1/3/2022
- Mead Johnson Denies Enfamil Causes Necrotising Enterocolitis | 12/28/2021
- Diarrhea Could Signal A Serious Digestive System Problem For Prematurely Born Infants | 12/21/2021
- The Nutritional Requirements Of Babies Born Prematurely Can Not Be Synthetically Engineered | 12/15/2021
- Premature Babies Should Be Fed Mothers Milk To Avoid NEC From Feeding Them Infant Formula | 12/13/2021
- Abbot Labs and Meade Inc. Are Obligated To Know About The Dangers Of Feeding Premature Babies Their Formula And To Inform Parents And Physicians | 12/9/2021
- Low Body Fat Is A Problem That Most Prematurely-Born Babies Suffer From | 12/7/2021
- Feeding Babies Mother's Breastmilk Rather Than Infant Formula Could Save The Lives of About 900 American Children Per Year | 12/6/2021
- Abbot Labs May Have Misrepresented The Nutritional Value Of Similac Baby Formula As Being Like Breast Milk | 11/30/2021
- Breastmilk Is Safer Than Infant Formula To Feed Premature Babies | 11/23/2021
- Children That Are Born Prematurely Struggle To Thrive On Synthetic Baby Formula | 11/16/2021
- Parents Of Children With NEC Should Consult An NEC Lawyer For Legal Advise | 11/16/2021
- The Parents Of Premature Babies Should Watch For The Symptoms Of Toxic Infant Formula | 11/16/2021
Lawyers for Baby Food Heavy Metals Lawsuits
We will represent all persons involved in a toxic baby food lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning there are never any legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. Anyone whose child was diagnosed with autism, ADHD, or another neurological disorder after eating contaminated baby food is eligible to receive a free, no-obligation case review from our attorneys. Simply contact our firm through the online contact form or the chat feature and one of our baby food lawyers will contact you promptly to discuss your case.